In analyzing and modeling supply chains, it is crucial to have a common understanding of the structures and processes. However, many textbooks, introductory articles and presentations begin with a sample diagram or symbol representation of a firm, linking to one or more symbols in either direction, representing customers and suppliers. This holds out two enticing possibilities:
1) That real life networks might be formally mapped, and
2) That such a graph will enable the understanding of the system.
Lillienfeld (1978) even argues that all system thinking is built on the idea of diagrams purporting to show relationships between entities. However, there is no consistent way of representing supply chains. The examples are usually either simplified or figurative rather than specific.
In our projects and daily work we fully appreciate the powerful advantage of mapping a process – a supply chain – unraveling it by distinguishing the actors, activities, services and resources. So, consider this to be a first small step towards this common vocabulary.